Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 39  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 489-497

Abdominal wall dehiscence in emergency midline laparotomy: incidence and risk factors


1 Department of General Surgery, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
2 Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
MD, MRCS Tarek O Hegazy
Department of General Surgery, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, 30 Anas Ben Malek Street, El Mohandeseen, Giza, 12655
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_7_20

Rights and Permissions

Background Burst abdomen is a very serious postoperative complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. It has a significant effect on health care cost, for both the patients and the hospitals. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and perioperative risk factors of burst abdomen in patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on 250 patients who underwent midline laparotomy at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital Emergency Department, Cairo University, from August 2017 until August 2018. Factors such as age, sex, BMI, substance abuse, previous laparotomy, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, ascites, albumin, renal functions, bilirubin, hemoglobin, intra-abdominal pathology, suture material, creation of stoma, postoperative chest infection, postoperative paralytic ileus, leakage, and wound infection were observed and analyzed. Results Incidence of burst abdomen was 12.4%. Wound infections (87.1 vs. 18.7%, P<0.001), anemia (48.4 vs. 5%, P<0.001), diabetes (41.9 vs. 10%, P 0.001), hypoalbuminemia (64.5 vs. 27.4%, P<0.001), previous laparotomy (29 vs. 2.7%, P<0.001), creation of stoma (48.8 vs. 18.7%, P<0.001), chest problems (51.6 vs. 15.1%, P<0.001), ascites (22.6 vs. 4.6%, P<0.001), leakage (38.7 vs. 0%, P<0.001), and peritonitis (71 vs. 45.7%, P<0.001) were statistically significant factors. Conclusion Important risk factors according to our study were wound infection, anemia, previous laparotomy, creation of stoma, hypoalbuminemia, ascites, diabetes, type of intra-abdominal pathology, with maximum incidences in peritonitis, postoperative cough, and postoperative leakage. Patient sex, age, associated morbidities such as jaundice and uremia, previous use of steroids, suture material used in closure, and postoperative paralytic ileus were not significant in our study.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed890    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal