Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 460-464

A clinical study on the hemorrhoidectomy and the elevation of the flaccid anal transition cuties in the fourth-grade internal hemorrhoid


Department of Proctology, Pyongyang Medical College Hospital, Kim II Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Date of Submission19-Mar-2018
Date of Acceptance06-May-2018
Date of Web Publication23-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Kim Chol Ryong
Department Proctology, Pyongyang Medical College Hospital, Kim II Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_46_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background We established the ligation and ablation of the fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid by elevation of the flaccid anoderm.
Patients and methods We analyze the clinical result of this operation method.
Results The average healing period with the technique used in the study was 21.3±0.68 days compared with the Milligan-Morgan technique of 24.2±0.92 days, and the complications and aftereffects were also less.
Conclusion The study reports that the ligation and ablation of the fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid by elevation of the flaccid anoderm is very satisfactory rather than the former operation methods.

Keywords: anoderm, atonic, fourth grade, hemorrhoidectomy, internal hemorrhoid, transition cutis


How to cite this article:
Ryong KC, Jong SG. A clinical study on the hemorrhoidectomy and the elevation of the flaccid anal transition cuties in the fourth-grade internal hemorrhoid. Egypt J Surg 2018;37:460-4

How to cite this URL:
Ryong KC, Jong SG. A clinical study on the hemorrhoidectomy and the elevation of the flaccid anal transition cuties in the fourth-grade internal hemorrhoid. Egypt J Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 17];37:460-4. Available from: http://www.ejs.eg.net/text.asp?2018/37/4/460/246036




  Introduction Top


Hemorrhoid is one of the anorectal diseases with relatively high incidence rate which shows slow recovery and often causes disability [1],[3].

Having bleeding and anal prolapse as a main symptom, fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid, which causes a great deal of change of anal duct’s architecture and anal dysfunction as a consequence, has a serious outcomes [2].

Recently, many countries including the US use a type of hemorrhoidectomy on the fourth-degree hemorrhoid with ligating the flaccid anus by elevating anoderm based on the Milligan-Morgan technique.

However, only with this operation method, we cannot overcome the following shortcoming such as cause of total and partial anoderm, long recovery, and complications and aftereffects [4].

Consequently to solve this problem, we carried out the research focusing on the following points:
  1. To establish the operation method of hemorrhoidectomy and anoderm in case of fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid.
  2. To clarify the clinical achievement using this operation method.



  Patients and methods Top


The study was carried out on 220 patients diagnosed as having fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid admitted to the hospital of medical college of the Kim II Sung University between 2014 and 2017 (study group 104 patients and contrast group 116 patients). All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  Techniques Top


First, an incision is made on the anoderm and the inner hemorrhoid node according to the hemorrhoidectomy in the Milligan-Morgan technique ([Figure 1]) [5],[11].
Figure 1 Changed anal canal in fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid.

Click here to view


When 1–1.5 cm height of the upper part of the hemorrhoid is reached, two strings of the silk thread are passed through the center of the hemorrhoid node, and ligation of the node with one string is done ([Figure 2]) [6].
Figure 2 Incised status after ligating the main proximal part of 7-o’clock position hemorrhoid at 1–1.5 cm of the upper part of the dentate line.

Click here to view


The other string is passed through 1–3 places according to the length toward the outside of the node, and then the same way is done from the outside to ligation [7],[8],[9].

Then the anoderm is elevated to the node of the hemorrhoid at the 1 cm height of the upper plate line ([Figure 3]).
Figure 3 4 places around the atonic anoderm are hooked with hemorrhoid proximal ligation.

Click here to view


Moreover, the hemorrhoid node is excised at the outside of the region 0.3 cm from the ligation made.

Hemorrhoidectomy is done to the rest of the hemorrhoid nodes according to the anal prolapse types in a similar way (leave the skin of 0.8 cm long between every wound; [Figure 4]) [15].
Figure 4 Elevated atonic anoderm by hemorrhoid proximal ligation hooked at 4 places.

Click here to view


Elevate the anoderm

Insert the aperture anoscope into the anal duct carefully to ensure if there is any bleeding or damage and put and fix the disinfected evacuation canal. Leave the suture for good discharge, and finally put the gauge and fix with the sticking plaster to finish the operation ([Figure 5]) [10].
Figure 5 Repaired anal canal after hemorrhoidectomy with elevating the anoderm.

Click here to view


Hemorrhoidectomy with ligating method based on Milligan-Morgan technique was done for the other group (contrast group) [13],[18].


  Results Top


Postoperation healing period

[Table 1] shows that the healing period of the study group is significantly shorter than the contrast group.
Table 1 Postoperation healing period

Click here to view


Postoperation complications

As one see, in the study group and the contrast group, anal stricture is the best part of the complications.

[Table 2] shows that the complication incidence is lower in the study group than the contrast group.
Table 2 Postoperation complications

Click here to view


Postoperation aftereffects

As one see, foreign body feeling is the main aftereffect not only in the study group but also in the contrast group.

[Table 3] shows that the aftereffect incidence is lower in the study group than in the contrast group.
Table 3 Postoperation aftereffects

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


So far various treatments for internal hemorrhoid have been discovered and widely applied, but their pros and cons have not reached absolute agreement.

This shows that there were some weak points because the treatment for internal hemorrhoid was dependent on radical cure to reduce subjective and objective symptoms, rather than the cause, thus the anatomical structure and physiological functions of the changed anal canal could not be fully recovered [12].

Therefore, it seems that the most important issue in achieving success in internal hemorrhoid treatment is to restore the anatomical structure of anal canal to its original state and for the better in the aftereffects of radical operation.

Owing to this issue, we performed hemorrhoidectomy for the fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid to remove hemorrhoid and drag flaccid anoderm above the line of the proximal part of hemorrhoid and could correct the anal change to the maximum and reduce complication and aftereffects of the operation [14],[20].

The main points of our new operation method are as follows.

First, we should ligate the proximal part of the prolapsed hemorrhoid at the height 1–1.5 cm above dentate line. That is because the superior rectal artery always branches at 3 cm above the dentate line toward the main hemorrhoid, and in advanced hemorrhoid, cushion tissues are increased, so that the dentate line descends lower than the original position [16].

Therefore, to prevent the relapse of internal hemorrhoid, the blood flow must be stopped in vein plexus under mucosa above the dentate line.

Second, the flaccid anoderm should be pulled up and attached at the height of proximal part of the hemorrhoid [19],[21].

That is because at the time of an operation the dentate line and anoderm, except wound surface, lose their bearing power to get off their normal anatomical position. At the same time their physiological function decreased.

What is more, after hemorrhoidectomy the wound surface is replaced with connective tissue during granulation phase, and mucosa loses its elasticity. In addition negative outcomes might occur and delay wound healing period [17].

So when the flaccid anal transitive skin without bearing power is dragged up to the proximal part of the hemorrhoid, all the components in the anal canal including the dentate line will return to their original position and will perform their normal physiological functions.

Third, the wound shape should be in drop shape and more than 8 mm should be ensured between the wounds. The reason is not only to leave larger trigger region in the anal canal but also to prevent improper granulation − wound by speeding up the epithelium of the inner wound rather that the outer one and to prevent anal stricture from wound fusion.

Fourth, in case of submucosal thrombus, thromboendarterectomy should be preceded by the elevation of flaccid anoderm.


  Conclusion Top


We have successfully performed ligation and ablation of the fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid by elevation of the flaccid anoderm.

We have clarified the clinical result of this operation method.

The average healing period was 21.3±0.68 days when introducing hemorrhoidectomy on the fourth-degree internal hemorrhoid with ligating the flaccid anus by elevating the anoderm, and the average healing period was 24.2±0.92 when introduced hemorrhoidectomy is based on Milligan-Morgan technique. The former was prominently higher than the latter (P<0.05).

According to the normal investigation, the former (97.1%) had prominently higher efficiency rate than the latter (87.9%), and complications and aftereffects were also less (P<0.05).

Clinical significance

This method corrects anal transformation and lessen negative outcomes by elevating the anoderm and the dentate line to the original position..

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the free medical care system in our country. The state funds all the therapies, drugs, cesarean birth, and so on.

Kim Chol Ryong contributed in concepts; Kim Chol Ryong contributed in design; Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong contributed in definition of intellectual content; literature search was done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; clinical studies were done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; experimental studies were done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; data acquisition was done by Kim Chol Ryong; data analysis was done by Sok Gum Jong; statistical analysis was done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; manuscript preparation was done by Kim Chol Ryong; manuscript editing was done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; manuscript review was done by Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong; guarantors are Kim Chol Ryong and Sok Gum Jong.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, de Simone G, Contessini-Avesani E, Peracchia A. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular haemorrhoidectomy in advance haemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182:64–68.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hetzer EH, Wildi S, Demartines N. New modakities and concepts in the treatment of haemorrhoids. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2003; 92:83–157.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shidlovskiy IN. The closest and long-term results of hemorrhoid treatment are the conservative method. Wedge Hir 1999; 8:61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AAP, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP. You have free access to this contentSystematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1603–1618.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RKS. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 2005; 81:946–954.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gibbons CP, Bannister JJ, Read NW. Role of constipation and anal hypertonia in the pathogenesis of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2005; 75:656–660.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
De Roover DMLR, Hoofwijk AGM, van Vroonhoven ThJMV. Lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of fourth degree haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2005; 76:1181–1183.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Alonso-Coello P, Zhou Q, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Mills E, Heels-Ansdell D, Johanson JF, Guyatt G. Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2006; 93:909–920.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ben-Chetrit E, Bar-Ziv J. Thrombosed hemorrhoid mimicking rectal carcinoma at CT. Acta Radiol 1992; 33:457–458.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Altomare DF, Giannini I. Pharmacological treatment of hemorrhoids: a narrative review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14:2343–2349.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bubrick MP, Benjamin RB. Hemorrhoids and anal fissures (common problems, current solutions). Postgrad Med 1985; 77:165–174.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kaii Y. Internal hemorrhoid nuclear therapeutic fissure operation. World J Gastrointest Surg 1991; 45:345–350.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Van de Stadt J, D’Hoore A, Duinslaeger M, Chasse E, Penninckx F. Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 2005; 105:44–52.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hidaka H. Selection of internal hemorrhoid treatment method ‘injection therapy’. JMAJ 1994; 42:128.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yasuhide M. Technique of hemorrhoid surgery. Clin Surg 1986; 41:994–998.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yasuhide M. Points of hemorrhoid surgery. Clin Surg 1989; 44:1609.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hiroyuki K. Exceptional diagnosis and treatment policy of internal femoral nucleus. Gastrointest Surg 2002; 25:1263–1270.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hiyoshi M. The practice of hemorrhoid therapy. Surg Treatment 1999; 80:293.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Akira K. Non-irrigant therapeutic treatment and surgery. Surg Treatment 1999; 80:288–291.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yasunobu T. Hemorrhoid ligamentectomy 1: the practice of open surgery. Clin Surg 1996; 51:588–589.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Shiba T. Anal anepithelial supporting tissue-retaining hemorrhoid ligature resection surgery. Gastroenterol Surg 1997; 20:309–313.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Techniques
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed42    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]